Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Least Shocking Study ever. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Least Shocking Study ever. Afficher tous les articles

Least Shocking Study ever

dimanche 8 novembre 2015

0 commentaires

One issue with "over testing" is where do you stop?
I mean from a malpractice standpoint.

Young chest pain with no risk factors. CXR, EKG. Do you get a trop? If you do, full r/o and stress test?
Some med mal guys will say if you start the workup you need to finish it.

Same with vertigo. I see some people getting CT scans and d/c.
We all know the CT scan will probably not show a posterior lesion.
If you are looking for central cause, why didn't you get an MRI?
Would you be better with H&P and d/c if nothing points to central cause?

Based on odds, young people are less likely to have anything serious, but those missed are a disaster from med mal.
I try to do what I think is best for the patient, and I think most patients like when we get tests.
If the patient doesn't want something, I have a conversation and document refusal and capacity.
If i'm really concerned they may get an AMA, which I'm not sure really helps.

I am at the beginning of my career.
I probably order too much stuff.
That may change, it may not.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.



Least Shocking Study ever

Copyright © 2010 Game Star | Free Blogger Templates by Splashy Templates | Layout by Atomic Website Templates